Where is my package? RM740109795CN

Asked by marsystem | 1/2/2017 6:47:01 AM

anybody can help me please? the tracking number is RM740109795CN

Thank you!

You may get the answer from the following articles:

Why is my package stuck in transit for so long?

How do I track a package from China?

Why can't I track my China Post package?

1 Answer(s)

Sally | 1/2/2017 6:58:53 AM Reply

Hi Marsystem,

It was just collected by China Post on Dec. 30 and now it's still in domestic transit in China now.

Tracking result:
2016-12-31 08:40
Zhengzhou Exchange Bureau, have been exported to each other (internal transit)

2016-12-31 07:15
Zhengzhou Exchange Bureau, have been exported to open

2016-12-30 19:41
Zhengzhou billing Center, left, and the next stop "Zhengzhou express"

2016-12-30 18:08
Zhengzhou billing Center

2016-12-30 15:51
Zhengzhou billing Center, has received send

Related Questions

Where is my package? RM740109795CN (1 reply)

anybody can help me please? the tracking number is RM740109795CN

Thank you!

Where is my package (12 replies)

I have a package coming from China Post with tracking AQ604698907CN. When I look up the status of the package it shows out for delivery on October 9th. However, we have not received the package and was not informed to pick up the package either. I am wondering where this package is and when it will be redelivered.

package's information is no longer updated (3 replies)

I have a package from the Netherlands, and it was sent to China in last December. However, after the package failed to deliver (I received no message or call), the package somehow was sent back and the last time the specific location was given was one month ago in Shanghai. And the website shows that package was sent to another carrier. Is the package was sent back to the Netherlands? How can I have my package????

the package code is RI108912006NL

Package not found (3 replies)

Where is my package? (0 reply)

Package lost (3 replies)

Please where my package (27 replies)

Undelivered shipment LT649156336NL, bad logistical information (4 replies)